Common sense should tell,by now, it is hard to believe any thing from our government. To cut back carbon, to the 60's levels, with the populations growing, I don't see how that would be possible. Health care, more about control then care. India and China will not go along with anything, if it requires verifications by anybody. All the other, smaller nations want more money and don't really care about climate control. The American government only wants health care and carbon emissions control, for exactly that, control. China will, more than likely, have a big say in what, when and how, the Obama administration spends money. The way the administration wants to go is to make the U.S. more like Germany. All the health care and climate change(man made global warming) is government made, so maybe it is man made. To draw 490 billion out of social security, to get universal health care, does not make any sense but if rationing health care is the goal, than it does make sense. To have our carbon levels be the same as the 60's, don't make any sense but if control of energy is the goal then it makes prefect sense. All that we have heard from Washington, in the last year, is to control health care and control energy, nothing that would help moving forward, as a matter of fact, it would be moving backward. China is using their abundant resource, coal. We have oil and coal, yet all of the government agencies will not let us use our resources, at all. We will never find a alternative fuel source, this way because all the technology will be stagnate. We will not have the will or means to move forward. The government will stop all technology that would lead to a fuel that is renewable because they can't control it. Wind power is said to bother the birds. Solar power, is not allow to be put in the desert because of an adverse effect on insects and what every wildlife is there. The environmentalist are against everything, no one can figure out what they are fore. The EPA is the worst agency that was ever started. The EPA is operated by any and all political hacks that the party in power puts in to run it. The problem with saying CO2 is bad make it okay to stop or reverse all technology. The question is, at what point does the cutting CO2 become dangerous to the plants and people. No one is asking that question. At some point, the lack of CO2 will hamper plant growth and ability of plants to produce oxygen. So cutting levels of CO2 may solve all the problems, health care, zero population growth and of course, global warming, because an oxygen deprived environment, no carbon based life form can survive. Think about that , cutting carbon, and we and all animals are, just what they want to cut, carbon based life forms. Silly isn't it? Can carbon be that bad? Is higher carbon amounts, what is needed to live? Maybe it forces plants to grow faster, bigger and makes plants to put out more oxygen. That is not any more off base then CO2 needs to be controlled .
Thanks
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment